Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:46
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
A 'Crazy Idea' About Pluto Was Just Confirmed in a Scientific First - ScienceAlert
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
With record crowd watching, Sky get blown out by Fever in first WNBA game at United Center - AP News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What are the major contributing factors to the current slump in demand for Tesla vehicles in Europe?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Another Bodybuilder Just Died a Horrible Death - futurism.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How did you adjust to civilian life after your military service in the British Army?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What are the strangest feeding mechanisms found in sea creatures?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Epic Effort to Ground Physics in Math Opens Up the Secrets of Time - Quanta Magazine